Timeline for Чаю vs. чая: what ending is correct?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2020 at 8:26 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Nov 8, 2012 at 17:39 | comment | added | user717 | This answer is really a comprehensive one, but to make it easier to understand, I would say that чаю can be translated as some tea. | |
| Jun 28, 2012 at 12:49 | comment | added | Armen Tsirunyan | @Anixx: I did. russian.stackexchange.com/questions/404/… | |
| Jun 28, 2012 at 12:37 | comment | added | Anixx | Create a question and I will answer. | |
| Jun 28, 2012 at 12:35 | comment | added | Armen Tsirunyan | @Anixx: Which are they. Apart from the traditional six, I am aware of the vocative, partitive, and locative. What are the other six? | |
| Jun 28, 2012 at 12:13 | comment | added | Anixx | Russian has 15 cases actually. But officially they teach only six. | |
| Jun 26, 2012 at 8:06 | vote | accept | texnic | ||
| Jun 26, 2012 at 8:05 | history | edited | texnic | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Punctuation
|
| Jun 25, 2012 at 20:25 | comment | added | Armen Tsirunyan | @texnic: посоветовался с профессором по русскому языку в университете и отредактировал ответ | |
| Jun 25, 2012 at 20:24 | history | edited | Armen Tsirunyan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 63 characters in body; added 40 characters in body
|
| Jun 18, 2012 at 11:16 | comment | added | Armen Tsirunyan | @texnic: Я может поспешил с предположением, что у слова коньяк ч.п. будет только коньяку. По ходу там тоже кажется две версии. Чем дальше я думаю, тем больше склоняюсь к тому, что почти у всех существительных м.р. две версии ч.п. Я еще подумаю и покапаюсь и отредактирую свой ответ. | |
| Jun 18, 2012 at 7:28 | comment | added | texnic |
Осталось понять, почему хлеба, но чаю и какие слова относятся к исключениям. А нельзя сказать я хочу ещё коньяка?
|
|
| Jun 17, 2012 at 15:00 | comment | added | Armen Tsirunyan | @z7sgѪ: It is considered as a special form of genitive | |
| Jun 17, 2012 at 14:21 | comment | added | z7sg Ѫ | My God, is this yet another Russian case?! Couldn't it also be considered as a special form of the genitive? | |
| Jun 17, 2012 at 14:11 | history | answered | Armen Tsirunyan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |