3

Normally a reflexivity of a verb stays the same regardless of aspect (not talking about semantic derivation). But I have learned three exceptions to this rule already:

станови́ться – стать (but: ста́ться разг.)

сади́ться – сесть

соску́читься – скуча́ть (по кому́-то / о ко́м-то)

I can only think of one example in Polish and always considered it an oddity, so I am wondering if this is a wider phenomenon in Russian. Are there other pairs of verbs like these?

  • 2
    Ложиться - лечь? – user75619 Dec 9 '18 at 17:53
  • 1
    скучать по кому is a modern deviation, correct case is Prepositional по ком – Баян Купи-ка Dec 9 '18 at 18:12
  • 1
    @БаянКупи-ка скучать о ком/чём (скучать о городе) would be more correct for Prepositional. – Arhadthedev Dec 9 '18 at 19:52
  • 1
    Prepositional is governed by both pronouns о and по, but the one of the two which is more applicable to the verb скучать is по. Dictionaries and grammar books do also mention о but i don't think i have come across many examples of its usage, and to me personally it sounds off. We can do a proper Google search to gauge frequency - скучал о - a little over 6000, скучал по - exactly 485 000 – Баян Купи-ка Dec 9 '18 at 20:09
  • 1
    and out of the 3 pairs you mention in 1 the roles are reversed, reflexive is perfective – Баян Купи-ка Dec 9 '18 at 20:23
3

Regular imperfective counterparts for стать, сесть, лечь should have been *ставать, *седать, *легать, but those forms have fallen out of use as standalone words in the codified language, though they continue to exist as roots: встать / вставать, присесть / приседать, налечь / налегать.

These forms have been suppleted with the reflexive causatives: -становить, -садить, -ложить are causatives meaning "make stand", "make sit" and "make lie", respectively, and when used with a reflexive postfix they mean "make oneself stand", "make oneself sit" and "make oneself lie".

I can't think of any more suppletive imperfective verbs with this exact paradigm (causative + reflexive) in Russian, but there are other paradigms: vowel alternation (умирать / умереть, собирать / собрать); stress alternation (насыпа́ть / насы́пать, нареза́ть / наре́зать); good old replacement with etymologically unrelated roots (ловить / поймать, брать / взять) etc.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    for all 3 verbs in question Ukrainian has retained genuine aspectual counterparts – Баян Купи-ка Dec 10 '18 at 15:43
2

It sounds logical :)

Ложиться - лечь

Pay attention that статься has the meaning of случиться, to happen.

при-/за-/на-/всмотреться - смотреть

дождаться - ждать

при-/за-/на-/вслушаться - слушать

наесться - есть (and there is a possibility to express having done enough of anything with the prefix на- and the reflexive particle -ся)

приесться - надоесть

...?

Actually, I would separate them in a way. Лечь, стать, сесть as the verbs of physical situation, and скучать, ждать, смотреть, etc. as feelings.

| improve this answer | |
  • "приесться - надоесть" are both perfective. – Sergey Slepov Dec 9 '18 at 23:43
  • 2
    Problem with those is that they aren't really aspectual pairs :( Aspectual pair is when two verbs only differ in aspect, not in the shade of meaning they have. наесться & съесть are both perfective, but they aren't equivalent semantically ;) But words of movement and location do seem to be weird in terms of reflexivity. – MrVocabulary Dec 10 '18 at 6:41
  • 2
    illustration - perfective of ждать is подождать, imperfective of дождаться is дожидаться, imperfective of надоесть is надоедать, while that of приесться is приедаться – Баян Купи-ка Dec 10 '18 at 7:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.