8

I need to know the approximate time учёный was substantivised.

Dahl has no separate entry for the word as either noun or adjective, but he does use it as a noun when defining other terms (e.g. «учоный, этимъ предметомъ занимающійся»).

The Russian corpus gave me identical-looking timelines for all instances and adjectival instances of ученый, and only a slightly different one for substantival instances. I have no idea how reliable these are.

Trying to find a direct answer doesn't lead anywhere. I'd be grateful for any pointers.

  • 4
    this is likely a shred of the collocation ученый мужъ, perhaps some chronological hints could be obtained from comparison between the stats of decline in its frequency and those of rise in frequency of учёный by itself – Баян Купи-ка Dec 22 '18 at 8:07
  • 4
    учёный, as any other adjective, has been used as a noun since time immemorial, the same way слепой or толстый are. The difference is that by now учёный has fallen out of use as a participle or adjective: you can't really say учёный математике or хорошо учёный without sounding archaic. Did you mean to ask when did that happen? – Quassnoi Dec 22 '18 at 11:48
  • 1
    @nikolayershov: I doubt you can make it work with учёный. There's probably a chance of pinpointing the use of образование (in the sense of "education") around late XVIII, not sure how would it fit with your goal though. – Quassnoi Dec 22 '18 at 15:25
  • 2
    my assumption was incorrect, judging by Google corpus учёный мужъ in Nominative is a collocation of extremely low frequency, the earliest source listed there in which учёный is used substantively is from 1760 in the first Russian journal of popular science "Ежемесячные сочинения и известия о ученых делах" founded in 1755, which i guess is a good starting point since this is when science began to be understood in Russia in the modern sense with application of the word наука in the corresponding meaning "из высоких наук" – Баян Купи-ка Dec 22 '18 at 20:13
  • 4
    From the RNC: "Художники и ученые истощеваются от трудов, чтобы что изящное соделать, и имена свои при сочинениях своих полагают." [М. М. Щербатов. Разговор о бессмертии души (1788)] or "Будучи как француженка жива и под старость, она имела около себя круг иностранный; актеры, художники, ученые к ней съезжались, и всякий день на детской половине был для них особый стол." [И. М. Долгоруков. Повесть о рождении моем, происхождении и всей моей жизни, писанная мной самим и начатая в Москве, 1788-го года в августе месяце, на 25-ом году моей жизни / Части 1-2 (1788-1822)] – Alex B. Mar 10 '19 at 20:01
-1

I doubt there will be any definitive answer to this. It is occasionally used as an adjective "учёный специалист", "учёный секретарь", but predominantly is used as a noun, and has been so seemingly always. You are looking hundreds of years ago, plus minus hundreds of years for the uncertainty

  • 2
    this does not answer the question - you basically say you don't know. – shabunc May 7 '20 at 8:45
-2

History of this word is closly connected to history of science in Russia.

The first "true scientist" in Russia was Lomonosov (1711-1765, scientific activity strated at 1740).

The Russian Academy of Science was established by Peter I in 1724.

This are good reference dates to start with. I believe that Peter I was the man who introduced this word.

  • 3
    this does not answer the question. – shabunc Jun 19 '19 at 10:24
  • Strange. Man asked : "I need to know the approximate time учёный was substantivised?". I've gave an approximate time (with some justifications). Why it is not an answer? – ksbes Jun 28 '19 at 8:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.