7

Did it disappear in some transitional period or later, when Modern Russian already existed?

5

The point is the Russian Plusquamperfect hasn't disappeared, it is still used with a bit transformed meaning and it is used with its normal meaning in Russian dialects.

By the 17th century its meaning changed and it began to mean an action which was going to start, but didn't start for some reason:

Я было собрался идти, но передумал.

(http://www.gramota.ru/spravka/buro/search_answer/?s=%EF%EB%FE%F1%EA%E2%E0%EC%EF%E5%F0%F4%E5%EA%F2)

The typical beginning of the Russian fairy tales, жили-были, is an example of the Plusquamperfect.

There's a detailed study of the Russian Plusquamperfect.

| improve this answer | |
0

It didn't. Modern Russian has three tenses (present, past and future), but in addition its verbs are either perfect or imperfect, like "приходить" & "прийти". Example

He was coming to conclusion at that time. == Он тогда приходил к заключению.

Here the verb (приходить) means that process was in making. However

He had come to conclusion at that time. == Он тогда пришел к заключению.

Here the verb (Прийти) means that at time considered in the sentence the result is already achieved.

In short 'perfectness' of verb tense have moved from grammar to vocabulary and is defined not by form of the verb, but by the verb used. The 'perfect' verbs are not full-fledged and do not have some forms 'imperfect' ones have.

| improve this answer | |
  • 3
    It seems you are confusing tense (perfect and imperfect) with aspect (perfective and imperfective). Tense defines location in time in relation to the reference point, aspect defines progression through time (state vs. state transition or single vs. repetitive action). – Quassnoi Jan 25 '13 at 15:57
  • @Quassnoi Mmm. No. The idea is that 'perfect' tenses are replaced with aspect (didn't know proper word here), so said tenses are not lost, but evolved. – permeakra Jan 25 '13 at 16:02
  • 3
    tense is время, aspect is вид. Perfect, by definition, does combine tense with aspect indeed. It's something done in past (as to the reference point) which bears a relevance to the reference point's present. However, Russian perfective / imperfective aspects (совершенный и несовершенный виды) don't define relevance but rather contrast state and state transition. In English, perfect simple ("has/had done") and perfect continuous ("has/had been doing") do the same distinction, both being perfect. – Quassnoi Jan 25 '13 at 16:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.