2

Would it make sense to say "Я очень экономичный муж", or "У меня такая экономичная собака" when someone wishes to allude to his being frugal with apparel, meal, diversions etc. Or a dog is small and consumes little. And all this allows to spare the family money on the whole.

4
  • That depends on what you are actually trying to convey.
    – Ainar-G
    Mar 4 '20 at 14:06
  • @Eugene this needs some additional clarification in what sense you are using "экономичиный" here. As soon as this context will be provided - I will reopen the question.
    – shabunc
    Mar 4 '20 at 14:07
  • Well, my question is as it is: are the word combinations such as these possible at all?
    – Eugene
    Mar 4 '20 at 14:28
  • what makes you thing it's impossible (or, on the contrary - possible)?
    – shabunc
    Mar 4 '20 at 15:21
2

No, you can't say экономичный meaning "frugal".

Экономичный means "cost effective", "frugal" would be экономный.

The latter is a neutral term, the former is objectification (the figure of speech opposite to personification).

That said, you can certainly say у меня очень экономичный муж or у меня очень экономичная собака meaning "I have a very cost effective husband" or "I have a very cost effective dog".

This would mean that they perform at the same level as conventional husbands and dogs, but require less investment and less maintenance. They consume less resources and yield higher ROI.

They might not look as fancy as other husbands and dogs, and be less comfortable, but they produce more measurable output for one ruble invested in them.

If you want to say that your husband is frugal and controls his expenses (rather than consuming less resources which you, in your generosity, allot for him), you should use the word экономный

7
  • Your explanation is correct, but you are not saying whether it's Ok to say "экономичный муж".
    – Alexander
    Mar 4 '20 at 19:29
  • @Alexander: the op was asking whether or not it made sense to say экономичный муж and I tried my best to explain what sense exactly would it make. If it's ok to say "cost effective husband" then it's ok to say экономичный муж, and vice versa.
    – Quassnoi
    Mar 4 '20 at 19:32
  • I beg to disagree here. In English, a phrase "cost effective husband", while funny, would have a spot-on meaning. In Russian, "экономичный муж" would create a confusion: "Ты хотела сказать экономный"?
    – Alexander
    Mar 4 '20 at 19:37
  • 1
    @Alexander Isn't that what I'm writing about in the very last sentence of my post?
    – Quassnoi
    Mar 4 '20 at 19:38
  • Yes. As I said, your answer is 100% correct, but not 100% straightforward.
    – Alexander
    Mar 4 '20 at 19:42
0

Well, it looks like the word you are looking for is "экономный", like in phrase "Мой муж очень экономный и старается не делать лишних трат". It's an exercise left to the reader imagine saying the same about dog - but "экономная собака" is as valid as, don't know, "щепетильная собака" - why the hell not after all.

With inanimate object adjective "экономичный" is used (in a meaning close to ergonomic, like in "экономичный двигатель".

Both of these word should not be confused with "экономический" - using them interchangeably is a mistake.

-1

If you mean frugal (person) or that a dog doesn't require a lot of money to keep, 'экономичный' makes no sense.

Экономичный implies equipment, method of production, etc. which saves energy, time and resources.

You can say 'экономный муж' , meaning he doesn't buy expensive things and always thinks how to spend money, i.e. FRUGAL.

As for the dog, it's tricky. I can't think of an adjective to express the idea of 'dog inexpensive to have'. A description may be required, e.g. на такую собаку не надо тратить много денег и времени (apparently some dogs are cheaper to have).

It should be noted that Russian and English adjectives with the 'economy' root may and do have different shades of meaning.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.