Are there homographs in Russian that sound different besides the stress?

E.g. like "read" in English:

I will read (ee) that book


I have just read (e) that book

P.S. I hope the answer to this question won't be just "NO" :-)

  • 1
    Seems to be duplicate of russian.stackexchange.com/questions/13767/…
    – Lara
    Aug 13 '17 at 11:50
  • But that question was closed for unclear reason. In the comments there was one more couple of words, besides of already mentioned here: пОлого (genitive of полый (hollow)) - полОго (adverb meaning "not steeply").
    – Lara
    Aug 13 '17 at 11:59

One example that I know is "считать". When it means "count" or "consider", it's pronounced with single "щ" in the beginning; but when it is perfective aspect of the verb "считывать" (to read off?), it's pronounced with separate sounds "s" and "ʧ".

  • I pronounce the second one with double "щ", yet still you've got the point! +1
    – Geo
    Mar 12 '14 at 21:15
  • Yet some people may pronounce the separate sounds in the first meaning too, for example an aunt of my mother always pronounced ч as ч and I think it is a variant of norm.
    – Anixx
    Mar 17 '14 at 0:47

Конечно is normally pronounced with [ш] for ч to mean 'of course' and with [ч] to mean 'finite': множество конечно, 'the set is finite'.


First of all, you will hardly find homographs that differ only by stress. Stress position may affect pronunciation of all vowels in a word. So I will answer a question whether there are homographs with the stress on the same syllable.

There are a lot of loaned words where letter е stands for non-iotated sound /ɛ/ and this case isn’t reflected in spelling in any way. And I can recall at least one word which can be misunderstood by this reason. Те́ста may be read /'tɛstə/ (gen. of тест — test) or /'tʲestə/ (gen. of тесто — dough, pastry). The same applies to instr. те́стом, dat. те́сту and prep. / loc. в те́сте.

  • Yet one can pronousce the word for test with soft t so the words become indistinguishable.
    – Anixx
    Mar 17 '14 at 0:39
  • "you will hardly find homographs that differ only by stress" - there's hundreds if not thousands of them: зАмок/замОк, пОлосы/полосЫ, вЫносим/вынОсим/выносИм. Aug 8 '17 at 9:44
  • @SergeySlepov, is’s strange to hear this from a native Russian speaker. За́мок in (Moscow) Russian is /'zamək/, while замо́к is /zɐ'mok/, по́лосы is /'poləsɨ/, полосы́ — /pəlɐ'sɨ/. Aug 8 '17 at 10:19
  • You are using non-phonemic transcription in your comment. In Russian transcription system they are written the same.
    – Anixx
    Feb 1 '20 at 17:31

Some words can become omographs if we omit dots above ё letter. This happens oftenly in modern internet communications.

Examples: мёл / мел; сёл / сел; осёл / осел; берёт / берет; etc.

Other than that I don't know any omographs besides the stress.

  • 2
    Non only in modern communications - letter ё is used mostly in educational literature, dictionaries etc.
    – Artemix
    Mar 12 '14 at 5:41

Метр can be read as [mʲetr] 'metre' or [mɛtr] to mean 'master', maître.

Around the 1990s, they changed the spelling for 'master' to мэтр to avoid the ambiguity, while метрдотель is still spelled with a soft e.


Another example I can come with is the word бог "god". In the sense of Christian God it can be pronounced with either plosive or fricative g, but in the sense of a polytheistic religion, like Ancient Greek one, it is always pronounced with plosive g.


If you accept proper nouns, then there is того (genitive of тот, with г pronounced [v]) and Того (Togo, the country).

  • 1
    They have different stress.
    – Anixx
    Feb 1 '20 at 17:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.