Skip to main content
added 2 characters in body
Source Link
Vadim Landa
  • 1.7k
  • 1
  • 10
  • 23

It's not offensive (unless used as a designation for a person) and not slang but vulgar it is, not quite aslike жопа оr worse, but enough to be avoided in a polite conversation.

Instead some literary/medical/anatomical terms are preferred or naming it with euphemisms.

It's not tagged as vulgar in the dictionary unlike жопа https://ru.wiktionary.org/wiki/задница

But none of the usage examples can be considered polite or decent

It's not offensive (unless used as a designation for a person) and not slang but vulgar it is, not quite as жопа оr worse, but enough to be avoided in a polite conversation.

Instead some literary/medical/anatomical terms are preferred or naming it with euphemisms.

It's not tagged as vulgar in the dictionary unlike жопа https://ru.wiktionary.org/wiki/задница

But none of the usage examples can be considered polite or decent

It's not offensive (unless used as a designation for a person) and not slang but vulgar it is, not quite like жопа оr worse, but enough to be avoided in a polite conversation.

Instead some literary/medical/anatomical terms are preferred or naming it with euphemisms.

It's not tagged as vulgar in the dictionary unlike жопа https://ru.wiktionary.org/wiki/задница

But none of the usage examples can be considered polite or decent

deleted 1 character in body
Source Link

It's not offensive (unless used as a designation for a person) and not slang but vulgar it is, not quite as жопа оr worse, but enough to be avoided in a polite conversation.

Instead some literary/medical/anatomical terms are preferred or naming it with euphemisms.

It's not tagged as vulgar in the dictionary unlike жопа https://ru.wiktionary.org/wiki/задница

But anynone of the usage examples can'tcan be considered polite or decent

It's not offensive (unless used as a designation for a person) and not slang but vulgar it is, not quite as жопа оr worse, but enough to be avoided in a polite conversation.

Instead some literary/medical/anatomical terms are preferred or naming it with euphemisms.

It's not tagged as vulgar in the dictionary unlike жопа https://ru.wiktionary.org/wiki/задница

But any of the usage examples can't be considered polite or decent

It's not offensive (unless used as a designation for a person) and not slang but vulgar it is, not quite as жопа оr worse, but enough to be avoided in a polite conversation.

Instead some literary/medical/anatomical terms are preferred or naming it with euphemisms.

It's not tagged as vulgar in the dictionary unlike жопа https://ru.wiktionary.org/wiki/задница

But none of the usage examples can be considered polite or decent

added 170 characters in body
Source Link

It's not offensive (unless used as a designation for a person) and not slang but vulgar it is, not quite as жопа оr worse, but enough to be avoided in a polite conversation.

Instead some literary/medical/anatomical terms are preferred or naming it with euphemisms.

It's not tagged as vulgar in the dictionary unlike жопа https://ru.wiktionary.org/wiki/задница

But any of the usage examples can't be considered polite or decent

It's not offensive (unless used as a designation for a person) and not slang but vulgar it is, not quite as жопа оr worse, but enough to be avoided in a polite conversation.

Instead some literary/medical/anatomical terms are preferred or naming it with euphemisms.

It's not offensive (unless used as a designation for a person) and not slang but vulgar it is, not quite as жопа оr worse, but enough to be avoided in a polite conversation.

Instead some literary/medical/anatomical terms are preferred or naming it with euphemisms.

It's not tagged as vulgar in the dictionary unlike жопа https://ru.wiktionary.org/wiki/задница

But any of the usage examples can't be considered polite or decent

Source Link
Loading