Timeline for Why is налогоплатЕльщик the correct form, and not налогоплатИльщик?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2023 at 13:37 | history | edited | CocoPop | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Oct 3, 2013 at 0:21 | comment | added | Yellow Sky | @Anixx - And also молельный and молебен. | |
| Oct 2, 2013 at 17:45 | comment | added | Anixx | the point is that when the verb has e the noun usually has e, when the verb has и the noun has и except in плательщик and молельщик (although the later could be from моление) | |
| Oct 2, 2013 at 17:23 | comment | added | Quassnoi♦ | @Anixx: yes, all those words do obey the paradigm. What's your point? | |
| Oct 2, 2013 at 17:07 | comment | added | Anixx | similarly радельщик from радеть | |
| Oct 2, 2013 at 17:01 | comment | added | Anixx | болельщик is from болеть (not болить), so the e is substantiated here. | |
| Oct 2, 2013 at 14:51 | comment | added | Quassnoi♦ | @Anixx: what did болельщик change from? And yes, there are lots of words keeping the paradigm (all those mentioned in your example), it just happened so that those two did shift it. | |
| Oct 2, 2013 at 14:38 | comment | added | Anixx | This does not explain why there is no such change in other words. Молельщик could change under analogy with болельщик. | |
| Oct 2, 2013 at 14:24 | history | answered | Quassnoi♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |